BOROUGH GOVERNMENT
HOME PAGE
BOROUGH PHONE DIRECTORY
COMMISSIONERS
CARL GROON, MAYOR
JOYCE GOULD
DON CABRERA
SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS
MINUTES OF MEETINGS
BOROUGH CODE NEW!
MUNICIPAL CLERK
BOROUGH TREASURER / CFO
PURCHASING AGENT
TAX ASSESSOR
TAX COLLECTOR
  TAX MAPS - PDF File NEW!
BOROUGH SOLICITOR
MUNICIPAL COURT
ZONING OFFICIAL
Land Use Regulations
Zoning Permit Applications
CONSTRUCTION OFFICE NEW!
CODE ENFORCEMENT
Fire Prevention
LAND USE OFFICE
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
TOURISM COMMISSION
BOARD OF EDUCATION
 
BOROUGH DEPARTMENTS
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER
CMC Animal Shelter
BEACH PATROL
Lifeguard Association
EMERG. MEDICAL / RESCUE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Volunteer Fire Company
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
RECREATION
Recreation Facilities Rental Information
Crest Pier Day Camp Information
Pool Schedule & Fees
Tennis Court Information
Festival and Craft Show Information
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TRASH & RECYCLING
 
COMMUNITY FEATURES
Getting Married in Wildwood Crest
2011 BOROUGH SUMMER ACTIVITIES
NEW RESIDENTS' INFORMATION
Flood Protection/Insurance Information
TOURISM & VACATION INFORMATION
STREET MAPS of Wildwood Crest
  LOCAL TIDE TABLES
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
WILDWOOD CONVENTION CENTER
CHURCHES
PUBLIC LIBRARY
CREST MEMORIAL SCHOOL
CREST HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  LOCAL LINKS 
 

 

 

 

   

VISIT THE WEBSITE OF THE

www.cresthistory.org

 
   

Attention Crest Residents!
Have an idea, listing, feature or comment on the web site?
CLICK HERE

 

 

Minutes of Commissioners Meeting   -   November 3, 2010

Note: Complete Meeting Appears on CD #32-10 and 33-10 on File in the Wildwood Crest, NJ Borough Clerk’s Office November 3, 2010
Wildwood Crest, NJ

Prior to the opening of the meeting, Mr. Groon led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

 

The meeting of the Board of Commissioners, Borough of Wildwood Crest, Cape May County , New Jersey , was held in the Municipal Court Room at 9:30 a.m.  On roll call the following answered to their names:

Gould - Cabrera – Groon – Yes

 

Mr. Groon read the following statement:  In compliance with the Open Public Meeting Act, Chapter 231, P.L. 1975, the notice requirements have been satisfied as to the time, place and date of holding said meeting by posting notice on the bulletin board in the Borough Hall and by mailing same to the Gazette-Leader, the Herald and The Press on October 23, 2009.

 

Mr. Groon next announced the one-way in and the one-way out method of ingress and egress in case of emergency.

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY:

ORDINANCE NO. 1110

A CAPITAL ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO VARIOUS MUNICIPALLY OWNED PROPERTIES, INCLUSIVE OF THE ACQUISITION/INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS AND APPROPRIATING THEREFOR THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 FROM GENERAL CAPITAL FUND BALANCE

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that Ordinance No. 1110 be passed on first reading, advertised according to law, be brought up for second and final reading and public hearing on Monday, November 22, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY:

ORDINANCE NO. 1111

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 3(b) AND 3(d) OF THE BOROUGH OF WILDWOOD CREST ORDINANCE NO. 1092, ADOPTED FEBRUARY 10, 2010, AUTHORIZING VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE BOROUGH OF WILDWOOD CREST

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that Ordinance No. 1111 be passed on first reading, advertised according to law, be brought up for second and final reading and public hearing on Monday, November 22, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.

Prior to the vote, Mr. Groon inquired if, under the pending ordinance, if it would be possible to make minor changes to the pending ordinance prior to the final adoption. The Clerk responded that it could not be done unless it was done as an amendment. He added that the reason was that, under Bond Law, the specific buildings that are included must be listed. The money as indicated, the total amount authorized being $1,580,600 by that bond ordinance can be redistributed so long as the maximum amount for the ordinance is not exceeded. Mr. Groon reworded his question by inquiring if any ordinance can be adjusted between introduction and adoption if it substantially does not change the ordinance, even if it is a language aspect. The Clerk responded that he would defer to the Solicitor, but added that if the amendment is not a substantive change, i.e. merely a typo, it does not have to be amended, but if it does in any way alter the intent or content of the ordinance, then an amendment would be required.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY:

ORDINANCE NO. 1112

BOND ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $1,575,000, AND

AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $1,499,800 BONDS OR

NOTES OF THE BOROUGH, FOR THE VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS

OR PURPOSES AUTHORIZED TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE

BOROUGH OF WILDWOOD CREST, IN THE COUNTY OF

CAPE MAY, NEW JERSEY

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that Ordinance No. 1112 be passed on first reading, advertised according to law, be brought up for second and final reading and public hearing on Monday, November 22, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY:

ORDINANCE NO. 1113

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 37, GARBAGE, RUBBISH, SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, ARTICLE I, SECTION 37-9, SCHEDULE OF COLLECTIONS, NUMBER OF PICK-UPS, AND ARTICLE II, BULK TRASH, SECTION 37-12, REMOVAL OF BULK TRASH, SECTION 37-18, COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS, SUBSECTIONS C(1) AND C(3), AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 841 ADOPTED MARCH 16, 1998

Mr. Cabrera motioned, seconded by Mrs. Gould, that Ordinance No. 1113 be passed on first reading, advertised according to law, be brought up for second and final reading and public hearing on Monday, November 22, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.

Prior to the vote, Mrs. Gould inquired about Section 1, 37-9, in which it states “the Commissioner of Public Works shall prepare a resolution annually indicating off-season/summer season schedules, including but not including specific days of trash/recycling collection throughout the Borough.” Her question was whether the new trash schedule would be implemented on January 1, 2010. The Public Works Superintendent responded in the affirmative. Mrs. Gould then inquired if in ensuing years the schedule will commence on October 1st. The Superintendent responded in the affirmative. Mrs. Gould asked that the schedule be as close to the current schedule as possible in order to not confuse the residents. The Clerk suggested that the resolution for the trash schedule be presented for authorization in September of each year, rather than November, if the schedule is intended to commence in October. The Superintendent responded “not necessarily.” The Clerk disagreed, stating that the schedule must be established prior to the commencement of the collection schedule. The Superintendent stated that the Borough’s calendar is published on a calendar year basis. The Solicitor stated that it will be an annual resolution which would be adopted in January to carry throughout the entire year. Mr. Groon stated that the object is to obtain a trash schedule for the entire year from Public Works prior to the publication of the calendar. The Clerk stated that under that scenario, no authorized schedule will be in place for 2011. Mr. Groon concurred, stating that an additional sentence may be required in the ordinance stating that it would take effect immediately pending submission of a schedule for the 2011 calendar year. Mr. Cabrera inquired as to the timeline for the effectiveness of the pending ordinance. The Clerk responded “before January 1, 2011.” Mr. Cabrera inquired if it would be possible to do the authorizing resolution at the final meeting of 2010. The Superintendent responded that it would have to be adopted prior to that date in order to permit printing and mailing of informational flyers. The Clerk stated that, if all goes well, the pending ordinance will be adopted on November 22, 2010, will be published on December 1, 2010, and will become effective twenty days thereafter. Mr. Cabrera suggested adopting the resolution for the schedule for 2011 at the final meeting in December, 2010. The Clerk offered that that may well resolve the problem for the upcoming calendar.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY:

ORDINANCE NO. 1114

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT SECTION 46-5.1, GROUP INSURANCE, OF THE CODE OF THE BOROUGH OF WILDWOOD CREST, COUNTY OF CAPE MAY, NEW JERSEY, AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 600 ADOPTED MARCH 19, 1985, ORDINANCE NO. 866 ADOPTED FEBRUARY 23, 2000 AND ORDINANCE NO. 1082 ADOPTED NOVEMBER 23, 2009

 

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that Ordinance No. 1114 be passed on first reading, advertised according to law, be brought up for second and final reading and public hearing on Monday, November 22, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.

Prior to the vote, Mr. Cabrera inquired if the matter could be moved to a closed session prior to the final vote since it related to Borough personnel as authorized by the closed session resolution to be adopted at a later time in the meeting. The Clerk responded that it can be discussed in closed session, provided the discussion does not pertain to any specific Borough employee(s). Mr. Cabrera stated that it was his intention to discuss Borough staffing in general and long-term plans for the Borough. In that event, Mrs. Gould withdrew her motion and Mr. Cabrera withdrew the second of the motion, pending discussion of the matter in closed session.

 

The Clerk noted for the record that Ordinance No. 1114 was being held, for further consideration, until after the closed session discussion later in the meeting.

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION BY TITLE ONLY:

RESOLUTION NO. 377-10

(Authorizing various transfers between 2010 budget appropriations in the total amount of $99,000)

 

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that the foregoing Resolution be adopted.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION BY TITLE ONLY:

RESOLUTION NO. 378-10

(Authorizing the cancellation of specific unexpended balances in the total amount of $101,507.85 from the General Capital Fund improvement authorizations)

 

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that the foregoing Resolution be adopted.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION BY TITLE ONLY:

RESOLUTION NO. 379-10

(Authorizing the cancellation of the remaining unencumbered balance of $13,728.09 in Ordinance No. 1072 and said amount be returned to the “General Capital Fund – Capital Improvement Fund”)

 

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that the foregoing Resolution be adopted.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION BY TITLE ONLY:

RESOLUTION NO. 380-10

(Authorizing refund of a tax overpayment in the amount of $1,860.87, for Block/Lot 30.01-2.02, a/k/a 6006 Seaview Avenue )

 

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that the foregoing Resolution be adopted.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION BY TITLE ONLY:

RESOLUTION NO. 381-10

(Authorizing refund of tax overpayment in the amount of $3,353.89 for Block/Lot 96.02-5.02, a/k/a 7400 Ocean Avenue )

 

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that the foregoing Resolution be adopted.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION BY TITLE ONLY:

RESOLUTION NO. 382-10

(Authorizing award of contract for West Side Drainage Improvements, Phase 1, to Asphalt Paving Systems, Inc. for the base bid amount of $475,700)

 

Mr. Cabrera motioned, seconded by Mrs. Gould, that the foregoing Resolution be adopted.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION BY TITLE ONLY:

RESOLUTION NO. 383-10

(Authorizing an increase of not to exceed $16,100 for the contract with Lomax Consulting Group to include both “in scope” and “out of scope” work)

 

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that the foregoing Resolution be adopted.

Prior to the vote, Mr. Cabrera inquired of the Engineer whether the increase included the necessary work for the preventative measures necessary to control the height of the vegetation. The response was in the affirmative.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that all bills properly authorized, as submitted and fully contained herein below, be paid.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

The first matter for discussion was the Phase 2 Rambler Road Park Project. The Clerk stated that he had submitted a checklist for the Phase 2 Rambler Road Park Project as prepared by the Engineer. He indicated that the total amount available for the project was $1.6 million, as further reduced by engineering costs. Mr. Groon stated that the list was formulated to expedite discussion and to come to a conclusion in order to give the Engineer a clear path for completing the project. He added that there are timelines coming up in March and June 2011, based upon the bids for Phase 1 had been received. Mr. Groon suggested going through the list item by item with a short discussion for each, make a determination as to each item, and at the end of the discussion a total, aggregate project (both Phase I and Phase II) amount.

 

The first item for discussion was the new bike rental/bathroom building ($482,000). That item has already been put out to bid, with a low bid received in the amount of $482,000 and that bid is “on hold” pending receipt of a permit as well as final award by the governing body. Mrs. Gould inquired if the size of the building had been increased to accommodate the bike rental shop. The Engineer responded in the affirmative. Mrs. Gould and Mr. Cabrera both expressed their agreement, as well as Mr. Groon, for inclusion in the final project.

 

The next two items were “gazebo roof option A” ($78,000) and “gazebo roof option B” ($62,000) and Mr. Groon indicated that it has been recommended by the Engineer to go with Option B. The Engineer explained the difference between the two by indicating that Option A had more new material with no use of existing timbers to maintain the same roof slope as the bike rental building. Option B incorporated reuse of timbers with a new roof at the current slope. He indicated that the difference in the slopes was minimal. Mrs. Gould stated her opinion that Option B should be authorized. Mr. Cabrera stated that he did not think a determination could be made without including a discussion about the Nesbitt Center . He stated that if the roof option and the gazebo and gazebo site work would put the gazebo at over $300,000. He added that with regard to the Nesbitt Center , in his opinion, it was a waste of money to make improvements to that building. He suggested removing anything regarding the Nesbitt Center from the project. Mr. Groon reiterated his inquiry regarding the two options for the gazebo roof, stating that it was his understanding that Option A was “not in play.” There was unanimous confirmation from the governing body to this effect.

 

Next was discussion of repair of the gazebo roof at $62,000. Mr. Groon cautioned that a vote for this item would include a vote for Item No. 7 (gazebo and gazebo site work at $242,000) on the list. Mr. Groon added that it would be fair to include Item No. 7 in the discussion. Mr. Cabrera stated that his thoughts were that there were $1.6 million available for the project, and the governing body had opted to reduce the scope of the project in order to potentially repair the Crest Pier roof. He added that if the gazebo and the Nesbitt Center roof are included in the project, no money will be saved. Mrs. Gould inquired as to the repair of the gazebo and the site work, asking if everything east of the gazebo would be removed. The Engineer responded that there would be all new landscaping, ADA compliant access to the gazebo landing, including rehabilitation of the concrete landing itself, elimination of the French drain, site lighting, and fill for grade. Mr. Cabrera inquired if the site work would increase if the gazebo were to be completely removed. The Engineer responded that it would depend on what exactly the governing body decided to do. Mr. Cabrera inquired if the existing gazebo, which is a wooden structure, could be relocated. The Engineer responded in the affirmative, adding that the governing body would have to decide if the cost was worth moving it. He added that it would be less expensive to build a replica, unless it was moved within the park area. Mr. Groon stated his opinion that the governing body would not be in a position to use the money for the Crest Pier roof since the park project would not be completed in time to bid the Crest Pier roof out by late August.

 

The Engineer stated that some of the other items on the list would have to be considered in conjunction with the gazebo, specifically with regard to the playground. He added that the playground will have to be relocated if the gazebo is to stay in order to fit the bike path into the allotted space; however, if the gazebo is to be eliminated, the playground may be able to remain where it is.

 

The Solicitor stated that if the governing body should determine to remove the gazebo, the cost for relocating the playground would not have to be considered. The Engineer concurred, stating that a portion of the cost would include an ADA compliant playground surface, which is a big ticket item, and that could remain as part of the project or be removed. The Clerk inquired if the entire cost could be eliminated if the governing body elected to do nothing with the playground. The Engineer responded in the affirmative, which would save approximately $66,000. Mr. Groon stated that there is one piece of playground equipment that must be replaced. Additionally, a better fencing system for security to prevent children from running out on the bike path is required.

 

Mr. Groon stated that he would like to reserve the right, once a path is chosen, to take one more look at each individual aspect of the project to see if there are any more economies to be found.

 

With regard to the third item on the list (gazebo roof Option B at $62,000), Mrs. Gould indicated her agreement and Mr. Cabrera disagreed with that item. Mr. Groon stated that in that instance, the seventh item on the list would become the same vote. Mrs. Gould stated that she was not in favor of the seventh item on the list (gazebo and gazebo site work at $242,000).

 

Concerning improvements to the Nesbitt Center , Mr. Groon inquired if the roof could be “pitched” at a reasonable cost. The Engineer responded that it could, if storage space is not a consideration. That would make Item No. 4 ( Nesbitt Center improvements without the roof at $144,000) on the Rambler Road Park Project list a “no” and the cost to be removed from the estimate. All were in favor.

 

As to Item No. 5 (Nesbitt Center roof to be funded from Ordinance No. 1092 as amended by Ordinance No. 1111), the cost for same was removed and placed in the amendment to Bond Ordinance No. 1092 introduced earlier in the meeting as Ordinance No. 1111. All were in favor.

 

In regard to Item No. 6 (general site work between Rambler and Primrose Roads at $242,000), Phase 2, was discussed. Mrs. Gould and Mr. Cabrera both indicated their agreement, subject to review and revision. All were in favor.

 

Concerning Item No. 8 (bike path between primrose and Lotus Roads at $141,000), the improvements to the bike path adjacent to the two vacant lots north to Lotus, Mr. Cabrera stated that those two blocks would match the architectural design of the park. He asked if the governing body agrees to this planned improvement, and whether it would mean a potential long-term course of improvements on the remainder of the bike path. Mr. Groon responded “absolutely,” adding that there are funding mechanisms available for improvements to bike paths, and it was his opinion that the street ends need to be addressed. He added that it may also set in motion an opportunity to widen the bike path, since it is currently very congested. Mr. Cabrera indicated his agreement with the plan. Mrs. Gould concurred. All were in favor.

 

With regard to Items No. 9 (relocation of playground equipment at $182,500) and No. 10 (new playground equipment and fence at existing location at $66,000), the Clerk indicated they had already been dealt with and should be removed. Mr. Groon stated that No. 9 was a definite “no” and that No. 10 would be reduced to $50,000. Mr. Cabrera stated that the existing piece of equipment is outdated and needs to be replaced. It was decided to leave Item No. 10 at $66,000 and do some research on pricing for playground equipment. All were in favor.

 

With regard to Item No. 11, demolition of the existing gazebo and site and installation of a new pre-fab gazebo plus site work at $150,000), Mrs. Gould indicated her disagreement. Mr. Cabrera stated that he deferred to Mrs. Gould. Mr. Groon concurred. For clarification, the Clerk inquired if the gazebo would be rehabilitated or demolished. Mrs. Gould responded that only the roof is being rehabilitated. Mr. Cabrera stated that it was his understanding that if the gazebo was to remain it must be rehabilitated for public safety reasons. He stated that a rehabilitation of the gazebo will cost over $300,000. The Solicitor stated that neither roof option for the gazebo received a unanimous vote and did not carry. The Clerk added that all three commissioners voted against renovation of the gazebo and gazebo site work (Item No. 7). The Clerk inquired if it was the wish of the governing body to remove the existing gazebo and replace it with a new one. Mr. Cabrera responded “no.” Mr. Groon stated that he did not want a new gazebo nor did he wish to rehabilitate the existing gazebo. Mrs. Gould stated that she wished to retain the existing gazebo at its current location. Mr. Groon responded that the gazebo cannot be left in its current form because of public safety concerns. He then asked the Engineer for a breakdown of the costs for Item No. 7, gazebo and gazebo site work at $242,000. The Engineer responded that it includes cleaning up of the area, but no replacement of landscaping. Mr. Groon inquired if the $242,000 included upgrading of the gazebo to make it safe at its current location. The Engineer responded in the affirmative. Mrs. Gould stated that the gazebo “is the Crest’s identity.” Mr. Groon stated that the playground will have to be moved because there will not be enough room at the site to retain the gazebo. Mrs. Gould indicated her understanding.

 

The Clerk inquired if a compromise might be to have a replica pre-fab gazebo. Mrs. Gould responded that a replica would not be possible. Mr. Cabrera suggested relocating the existing gazebo. There was further discussion regarding the gazebo and the playground.

 

The final total of the items to be included in the project was $1,189,000.

 

The Engineer was asked to revise the plan accordingly and to present it for final review by the governing body.

 

The next matter for discussion was the 2011 Capital Projects. Mr. Groon stated that the original numbers to replace the Crest Pier roof were $1.1 million. He added that the figure is excessive and that a budget should be set with new instructions from the governing body. Mr. Groon indicated his opinion that the Borough cannot afford to spend $1.1 million for a new roof on the Crest Pier. However, Mr. Cabrera had indicated that it would be possible to do all of the roofs and the mechanicals for around $800,000. Mr. Groon stated his opinion that a twenty-five year roof would suffice. He added that the mechanicals are approximately twenty-five years old, which are causing heating issues throughout the building. Additionally, the use of the building has changed over the years which impacts the mechanicals. He suggested a comprehensive review of the project by the governing body.

 

Mr. Cabrera stated his opinion that in the review the governing body must decide to what use the “commercial stores” will be put. He stated that there is a piece of equipment/mechanicals for each of the stores, and, therefore, the use of the stores will have to be determined as a guide to the mechanicals. The Clerk stated that the sole remaining tenant in the beauty salon had been advised that her lease will expire in the spring of 2011. He indicated that if that determination changes, he would need direction from two or more members of the governing body. He added that the Historical Society is also housed in one of the stores, and he questioned whether they would be permitted to remain. Mr. Cabrera stated that as commercial space is removed, there needs to be a good plan as to how the space will be used. Mrs. Gould stated that she had received calls from several of the clients of the beauty salon, and had also received a call from the owner of another salon who had offered space for the Borough’s tenant in his shop. Mr. Groon suggested that Mr. Cabrera and his staff present a lay-out of the north side of the building. He also suggested speaking to the Historical Society to determine if they need more room for their purposes.

 

With regard to the mechanicals, the Public Works Superintendent stated that the mechanicals can be “generalized” for the entire building. The Engineer stated the use of the space would determine how the mechanicals are installed. He added that the building does lend itself to a centralized control.

 

Mr. Groon stated that a plan of action needs to be in place by May in order to commence work in August.

 

Mr. Cabrera inquired if solar panels could be discussed as part of the review, since he would like to “get a feel” for the numbers. Mr. Groon asked if a membrane roof would make it more difficult to do solar panels in the future. The Engineer responded that they can be done.

 

A revised plan will be formulated and presented to the governing body for their consideration.

 

With regard to the beach improvements, the Clerk indicated that the transfer resolution as prepared by the CFO will provide for those improvements to accommodate the needs of Public Works for the purchase of dune grass, etc., prior to the close of the current fiscal year.

 

The next matter for discussion was the UEZ administrative charges. The Clerk and Mr. Cabrera both indicated that they had no further updates.

 

With regard to the 2011 Borough Hall seasonal work schedule, the Clerk indicated that Mrs. Gould had circulated her written response to the proposal. Mr. Cabrera stated that he had not had a chance to review Mrs. Gould’s response.

 

Concerning the M. W. Mitchell bayfront improvements, the Clerk indicated that the Solicitor and Engineer were working together in conjunction with the applicant’s attorneys to resolve the matter.

 

The Clerk requested direction from the governing body with regard to the 2011 Hydrofest. He indicated that the dates he had been provided were October 1 and 2, 2011, as requested by the organizer of the Hydrofest.

Vote:          Cabrera-Groon-Yes                                 Gould-No

It was decided that a resolution would be prepared for the meeting of November 22, 2010.

 

Mrs. Gould inquired of the Engineer whether the reconstruction of the Sweetbriar bayfront pier would remain metal or another type of material. The response that it would be composite decking.

 

There being no further matters for discussion in open session, THE CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION BY TITLE ONLY:

RESOLUTION NO. 384-10

(Closed Session: Matters involving potential acquisition of land, and for personnel matters, specifically involving the employment relationship affecting benefit levels for unrepresented employees)

 

Mr. Groon motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that the foregoing Resolution be adopted.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

Upon returning from closed session, Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Groon, that Ordinance No. 1114 be passed on first reading, advertised according to law, be brought up for second and final reading and public hearing on Monday, November 22, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

There being no further matters for discussion, Mrs. Gould motioned, seconded by Mr. Cabrera, that the meeting be adjourned.

Vote:          Gould-Cabrera-Groon-Yes

 

Dated:        November 22, 2010

Kevin M. Yecco, Borough Clerk

MINUTES OF MEETINGS INDEX